David Protein
Blueberry Pie
TL:DR
In 2 Sentences
An extreme protein-to-calorie ratio—28g of protein for 150 calories—with sweetness and texture engineered from alternative sweeteners and a calorie‑reduced fat, not fruit or nut butters.
When to choose David Protein Blueberry Pie
Macro‑chasers who want a lean, portable protein hit post‑workout or on a cut; less ideal for folks who prioritize short, ‘pantry‑style’ ingredient lists or avoid artificial sweeteners.
What's in the David Protein bar?
If you like your protein bars to pull their weight, David Protein’s Blueberry Pie comes in stacked: 28g of protein (a top-tier showing) packed into just 150 calories. That protein is built on a dairy-and-egg backbone—milk protein isolate first, then whey concentrate and egg white—with some collagen blended in.
Carbs are kept low with a toolbox of refined sweeteners (maltitol, allulose, glycerin) and a small hit of tapioca starch, while fat is unusually low, in part because the formula leans on a modified plant fat (EPG) to keep texture without many absorbable fat calories.
One surprise: there are no blueberries on the label—the “pie” character is created with natural and artificial flavors, a touch of citric acid, and color from pea flower extract and carmine.
- Protein
- 28 g
- Fat
- 2 g
- Carbohydrates
- 12 g
- Sugar
- 0 g
- Calories
- 150
Protein
2815HIGHThe heavy lifter here is milk protein isolate—essentially casein and whey filtered from skim milk—supported by whey protein concentrate and egg white. Together they deliver complete, highly digestible protein, which explains the bar’s 28g and top‑end protein percentile. Collagen is also in the blend; it helps with texture and adds grams, but it’s not a complete protein, so the dairy and egg components do the quality work.
Fat
29LOWWith only 2g of fat, there isn’t much here; what’s present comes mostly from palm kernel oil and coconut oil (both saturated) plus a “modified plant fat (EPG)” that functions as a calorie‑reduced fat alternative. While palm and coconut skew saturated, the overall saturated load per bar is tiny because the total fat is so low. If you’re looking for unsaturated oils like olive or nut butters, this isn’t that style of bar—it’s intentionally lean.
Carbs
1220LOWThe 12g of carbs come from a mix of refined ingredients rather than whole grains or fruit: a little tapioca starch (a quickly digested cassava starch) alongside maltitol (a sugar alcohol), allulose (a very low‑calorie sugar), and glycerin (a plant‑derived syrup that holds moisture). This combo keeps sugars at zero and generally blunts sharp glucose spikes compared with regular sugar, though tapioca is fast and polyols can bother sensitive stomachs at higher intakes. Think engineered, steadier sweetness over slow‑burn, whole‑food carbs.
Sugar
04LOWZero grams of sugar here because sweetness is built with a blend: a sugar alcohol (maltitol), a low‑calorie rare sugar (allulose), glycerin for softness, and tiny amounts of artificial sweeteners (sucralose and acesulfame potassium). None of that sweetness comes from blueberries or other fruit. This typically means steadier blood sugar than a sugar‑sweetened bar, with the caveat that sugar alcohols can cause GI rumblings for some people.
Calories
150210LOWAt 150 calories, most of the energy is coming from protein; fat is minimal, and some of the carbohydrate sweeteners (allulose, maltitol) contribute fewer calories than sugar. The use of a modified plant fat (EPG) also helps keep absorbable fat calories down. Net effect: a very high protein‑to‑calorie ratio for those chasing lean protein.
Vitamins & Minerals
You get about 10% Daily Value of calcium, which makes sense given the bar’s reliance on milk protein isolate and whey. Beyond that, there’s no meaningful vitamin fortification—vitamin D sits at 0% and minerals are otherwise modest.
Additives
This is a highly engineered bar: emulsifier (soy lecithin) for texture, a trio of alternative sweeteners (maltitol, allulose, sucralose/acesulfame K) for sweetness with fewer sugars, glycerin to keep it soft, and a modified plant fat (EPG) to lower fat calories while preserving bite. Flavor and color are built, not from fruit, but from natural and artificial flavors plus pea flower extract and carmine, with a touch of citric acid for brightness. If you prefer short, pantry‑style labels, this will read as quite processed; if you want precise macros, it’s purpose‑built.
Ingredient List
Skim cow milk
Bovine, porcine, poultry, or fish skins/bones
Cow's milk whey
Eggs
Corn or wheat
Fats and oils
Corn or beet fructose syrups
Cassava root
Soybeans
Oil palm fruit
What are people saying?
Sources
Range
“David bars taste very very good and the macros are unbeatable.”
“Taste I can handle it’s more neutral than bad for me. Macros make it taste amazing. Clear whey isolate protein powder and a David bar for a post workout snack. 250 calories, FIFTY G OF PROTEIN. Issa wrap fr.”
“I have not experienced this yet. I've been buying them for a few months. I eat one a day, usually with breakfast”
Main Praise
The headline praise is simple: the stats are wild. Multiple outlets—from Bon Appétit to Men’s Health—frame David as a modern food‑engineering feat, and Reddit user myfrontallobe10 put it plainly: ‘macros are unbeatable.
’ Fans also highlight that the bar actually eats well for something this lean; Bon Appétit liked the less‑chewy, doughy texture, and The New Yorker noted a salty, crunchy bite that keeps you nibbling.
The Blueberry Pie flavor reads like…blueberry pie filling with some crust notes, per Men’s Health—pleasantly on theme for a bar with zero grams of sugar. On Amazon, happy buyers say it keeps them full through busy mornings, with one reviewer swapping it in for cereal and staying satisfied until lunch.
A few power users even stack it with a shake after lifting to hit around 50 grams of protein without blowing the calorie budget. Functionally, it does what many bars promise and few deliver: a big protein payload without the calorie creep.
Main Criticism
Taste is polarizing. Several Redditors call it bland or ‘nasty but fantastic macros,’ and Men’s Health clocked a familiar chemical tang after the initial sweetness—common in ultra‑lean, high‑protein treats.
Texture can divide people too; The New Yorker’s Hannah Goldfield noticed a thin, waxy film after a bite, and a few Reddit threads mention ‘oily’ bars (though others in the same thread said they hadn’t seen it).
Ingredient philosophy is another fault line: recent formulas include maltitol, sucralose, and acesulfame potassium, which some shoppers avoid, and the ‘blueberry’ experience relies on flavors and color rather than actual fruit.
There’s also practical griping about price, especially around certain small-count sample listings that surprised buyers on a per‑bar basis. Finally, sugar alcohols can bother sensitive stomachs—something to watch if you know polyols don’t love you back.
The Middle Ground
So where’s the truth? Somewhere between ‘lab wizardry’ and ‘useful tool.
’ If you judge a bar by protein efficiency, David is top of the heap: 28g in 150 calories, built on high‑quality milk and egg proteins, with collagen there mostly for texture.
If you judge by a short, whole‑food label—or want actual blueberries in your Blueberry Pie—this won’t be your north star.
Reddit user pkavsb calling it ‘nasty but…fantastic macros’ perfectly captures the split; meanwhile, myfrontallobe10 and a chorus of Amazon fans find the taste good enough (or at least neutral) to make those macros sing.
Media tasters land in the middle: Bon Appétit liked the texture; Men’s Health found a pie‑ish flavor with an aftertaste; The New Yorker praised the salty crunch but flagged a mouth film.
The likely reconciler is expectations: treat it less like dessert and more like a protein‑first supplement you can chew. If you’re curious but cautious, try one bar before buying a case, and consider chilling it—some people find cold temp tightens the texture and softens sweetness.
What's the bottom line?
David Protein’s Blueberry Pie bar is a scalpel, not a croissant. It’s purpose‑built to deliver a big, complete‑protein hit with minimal calories, using alternative sweeteners and a calorie‑reduced fat to keep things lean. That design shows up in both the wins and the tradeoffs: standout macros and satiety on one side; a processed ingredient deck, occasional aftertaste, and a texture some describe as waxy on the other.
The blueberry ‘pie’ experience comes from flavors and color rather than fruit, which will either feel cleverly on‑brand or like a dealbreaker, depending on what you want from a snack. If you’re chasing protein targets, cutting, or just prefer your snacks to do serious macro work, this is a compelling pick. If you want whole‑food sweetness, no artificial sweeteners, or you’re sensitive to sugar alcohols, skip it.
Think of it as a portable, chewable protein supplement that happens to taste like dessert—on its best day. Condensed listicle take: A macros‑first ‘blueberry pie’ bar with 28g protein for 150 calories; excellent for post‑workout or cuts, less so for whole‑food purists or sweetener‑avoiders.